New BCG Study Identifies Major Trends That Will Continue To Drive M&A Through Volatile Financial Markets
One of the largest-ever studies of mergers and acquisitions (M&A), conducted by The Boston Consulting Group (BCG), identifies several trends that will continue to drive high deal flow, albeit at a reduced rate, through current volatility in the global financial markets.
The study, published in a new BCG report entitled The Brave New World of M&A: How to Create Value from Mergers and Acquisitions, is based on a detailed analysis of more than 4,000 completed deals between 1992 and 2006. It is believed to be the largest nonacademic study of its kind.
"We are seeing a return to normalcy, which is healthy," said Jeff Gell, a Chicago-based partner and coauthor of the report, upon its release. "Prices and leverage will come down slightly, but volumes will remain high as the strategic need for most deals is still present. Companies are still sitting on excess cash that they need to deploy, and private equity funds still have large war chests that they need to put to work."
Among the major trends identified:
Global Consolidation Is Accelerating
Consolidation deals as a portion of the total value of transactions leapt from 48.7 percent in the period 1999 to 2000 to 71.4 percent last year. Globalization, more liberal regulatory environments, and ample funds for M&A will continue propelling this trend.
Private Equity Is Playing a Growing Role
Private equity firms' share of the total value of transactions has leapt from 6 percent to 24 percent (1996-2006). In absolute terms, the total value of PE deals soared from $160 billion in 2000 to $650 billion in 2006.
Developing Markets Are Helping Fuel the Boom
The Americas account for the largest share of deal value (46.5 percent), but Europe has drawn closer (29.5 percent). Between 2002 and 2006, China's and India's deal value grew by 20.4 percent per year.
The study also explodes a number of myths about M&A. Among the contrarian findings:
Private Equity Is Winning by Paying Less
It's commonly assumed that PE firms have gained an increasingly large share of the M&A market by using their huge reserves of capital to pay over the top for targets. But BCG's analysis indicates that, on average, PE firms pay lower multiples and lower acquisition premiums than "strategic" buyers. One of the reasons why PE firms appear to pay less, on average, is that they tend not to bid for targets in industries where there is strong consolidation logic and where high multiples are commonly paid, so their average multiples are less influenced by large, individual multiples than those of strategic buyers.
Higher Acquisition Premiums Do Not Necessarily Destroy Value
Between 1992 and 2006, value-creating deals had a 21.7 percent premium, on average, compared with an 18.7 percent premium for non-value-creating transactions. Paying higher premiums appears to be especially valuable during periods of heightened activity (such as now). Acquirers that pay larger premiums have destroyed less value during these periods.
Bigger Isn't Necessarily Better
Deals over $1 billion destroy nearly twice as much value on a percentage basis as deals below $1 billion. And deals destroy progressively more value as the size of the target increases relative to the size of the acquirer. Targets worth more than 50 percent of the value of the acquirer destroy twice as much value on a percentage basis as targets worth less than 10 percent of the acquirer.
>>> GO TO PAGE 2
India Inc prefer North America and Asia forGlobal Acquisitions... Click here
M&A by Indian Cos at Foreign Turf valued at US$11.37 bn... Click here
Cross-border banking consolidation continues... Click here
Read about M&A in Indian Banking Industry ... Click here
CLICK FOR MORE FEATURES & STORIES