Query : |
This is regarding the observation that once a VRS application is made, the bank has to accept it because of a Supreme Court ruling to that effect. Is this really true ? If it is, then how can the SBIVRS scheme make a distinction between eligible and ineligible categories? Further, if an applicant is considered ineligible because he is 'highly qualified' as per norms decided by the bank, and if this very qualification was never taken into consideration by the bank earlier (by non-promotion etc.), can such an inconsistent stand not be contested in court?
|